April 29, 2009

What's Next?

I've been speculating for a few posts now about the prospects for our next Mayor. There's a group trying to recall Funkhouser. I don't blame them. His lack of political skills means that if he's not bungling political appointments, we have to put up with the tawdry soap opera that is his wife, whose sins include bigoted, perhaps even illegal behavior toward city hall minority workers, public descriptions of the Mayor's private medical examinations, and presuming to speak to corporate leaders on behalf of the city. (Remember her promise a few years ago to help Wal-Mart score a midtown location? I sure do.)

As I've said before. Outrage over this is no excuse for not thinking beyond the recall. That's what I've tried to do over the last few weeks. Here are a few more thoughts.

Could Our Next Mayor Be Hispanic?

One popular assumption is that Sly James or Al Riederer will run against Funkhouser in the recall election. I should put emphasis on the word assumption. That's because there's no guarantee that either one will step up to the plate this year. Let's say they hold back and no viable candidate steps up from the African American community. A Hispanic candidate could conceivably put together enough Hispaic, African American, and liberal votes to take the Mayor's office.

I'm making no assumptions about whether that will be good or bad. As with all elections, it depends on the candidate. As a liberal, the race of a candidate is not a factor in my voting decisions. If a Hispanic candidate steps up, I'll give him or her my consideration.

Low-Hanging Fruit

My statements that I won't get behind the recall until a specific viable alternative is presented has met with shock at best, and outrage at worst. The later sentiment is so widespread, it's obvious to me that many Kansas City voters would pick anybody but Funkhouser in a recall election. This attitude sets the bar for attaining the Mayor's office dangerously low. It's possible, even likely that too little scrutiny will be given to whomever steps up.

In other words, the failure to consider step two puts us in a situation were we could conceivably get someone worse than Funkhouser.

2 comments:

cookinghamjr said...

Funk is the worst mayor in history.

The problem is, no one can make a clear and credible case for a recall, other than he is not showing leadership.

Is it in the city's best interests to spend $500,000 on an election to get a marginally effective mayor for one year?

That is the best case scenario.

This recall effort will most likely fail for want of signatures. If they do get the signatures -- they need 22,000 at a minimum, and they have yet to raise 15K with ten working days left -- getting people to vote Funkhouser out for crimes and misdemeanors against the city is tough. Alot of people don't like him, including me.

However, what is the law? If the law was that voters can recall a mayor based upoon their own will and their own definition if dis-satisfaction, then so be it.

However, the law says it must be because of mal, mis or nonfeasance.

Under the law I do not believe Funkhouser meets that criteria, and we must follow the law.

The closest he comes is nepotism, which is malfeaseance, but that is a difficult case no one has been willing to make in a court of law, much less in the court of public opinion.

Plan on this being challenged in court for quite some time, the minute the petitions are ratified by the elction bureau.

All this, plus $500,00 to have a marginally effective mayor in a weak mayoral system of government for about a year.

Does anybody think that is in the best interests of the city?

Cookingham, Junior

PS It's Sly JAMES, not Sly Jones.

12th and Main said...

Actually what I wrote was Sly Stone. I knew I'd make that mistake sooner or later.